Hi, Id like to share this information with you and hope you will try to figure out what I'm talking about. Please read till the end.
I watched 'robert menard' 'The Magnificent Deception' movie a few months ago and what he says is VERY important and hard to beleive. I started to read the law to verify every thing that he said and most things are verified.. Eventhough reading the law is a nightmare (and not a very good idea if your trying to raise your vibration), I beleive like he says that its our responsability to understand what is said.. If you feel like reading the law, I suggest you start by listening to "rob menard" (on youtube) and then go from the few keywords to look for. But first there is something else you should know.YOUR STORY.
For those who don't know, you have a 'juridical personality' and this person is a corporation. Your "birth act" and "birth certificate" are in fact your 'juridical person' act(constitution) and certificate. Corporation names must be spelled in uppercase and that is why your name is spell in uppercase in any legal documents. Its my understanding that someone has reserved property rights(trademarks) in your 'legal name' the name of your 'juridical person'. Also, the certificate is a claim of ownership and guess how has the original, not you. This mean they can easily pretend (and have the legal documents to prove it) that they own your 'juridical person' and 'legal name'. To their eyes you are attached to the 'juridical person' as a good (a human resource)...
What this means is they can take money from your bank account if you don't pay IRS for instance, and they have the rights, and technically thats because your 'juridical person' owes to the IRS. Your 'juridical person' has a job not you. Your bank account is your 'juridical person' account not yours and they have a property right on anything the 'juridical person' own. THE BIG PICTURE.
There seems to be 2 categories of laws
-LEGAL LAWS (basically crap laws stating what is already stated in LAWFUL LAWS)
-LAWFUL LAWS (natural law, commercial law, common law)(applies to the human beings)
You will soon realize that banks, governments, justice, contracts, commerce use 'commercial law' but they don't want you to know that. They want you to look at the LEGAL LAWS and you will see that its so messy that you will find it very hard to follow but the information is there..
From my understanding laws should be read in this order.
1)Natural law (gods law)(LAWFUL)
2)Commercial law (LAWFUL)
3)Common law (LAWFUL)
4)Statutory law, (LEGAL, crap repeating what is said in 1,2,3)
5)Political law (LEGAL, crap repeating what is said in 1,2,3)THE SOLUTION TO YOUR STORY
The following is a copy paste for this article - http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/11/23/get-government-to-lawfull...
Maxims of law.
-An un-rebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.
-An un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgment in commerce.
-An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.
A ‘private’ affidavit, if the whole process is done correctly, creates a ‘lawfully’ binding agreement/contract between the parties that rises far, far above any ‘legal’ contract/agreement; in fact as paperwork goes, an affidavit from the ‘private’ side is superior to all other documents, full stop! You could go as far as to term the private un-rebutted affidavit as ‘Sovereign Law’ because an affidavit from the private side and sworn under 'unlimited commercial liability' indicates that a sentient living private man/woman is behind it, and therefore a Sovereign. (Warning - Please make sure that whatever you put on an affidavit is your truth). Do NOT use affidavits lightly. Research what you are doing if you are unsure. Affidavits are simple and incredibly powerful law documents. There is nothing to be fearful of whilst using them, but please comprehend what you are doing before firing them off!
Q. Why is a private affidavit so powerful?
Basically because as a private man/woman you can operate under 'unlimited commercial liability' and public entities cannot. You see all public entities have what is called a ‘scope of office’ – which is basically a job description and conditions for which they have limited liability insurance cover. For instance, if a Police Officer believes that you are becoming threatening or aggressive he can make the decision to use appropriate force to restrict and arrest you. Now if in the tussle you fell and broke your arm, the Police Officer does not have to worry about prosecution because using appropriate force in this situation is in his ‘scope of office’ and therefore falls under his limited liability insurance policy. But, if the Police Officer was to punch you in the face whilst you were sat in your car, he can now be prosecuted for a criminal offence. If the prosecution stands then his insurance would not cover him in anyway. Therefore he could do jail time, be fined and lose his job as his actions did not fall under his insured ‘scope of office.’ EVERY public official, agent and employee has a ‘scope of office’ – that’s worth remembering!
In commerce, the game is won by the party who took the biggest risk, and as you sign under 'unlimited (full) commercial liability', the public entity cannot match that as they are under limited liability; unless they are willing to forego this and risk losing their own possessions and career; as far as I know no public entity has ever wanted to take that risk, understandably as they know they are involved in fiction. This is why it is also worthy of reiterating that you should only put your truth on an affidavit, because if it turns out that you have deliberately lied then you risk your commercial credibility for life; and anyway it is against EVERY law to use fraud/lies in your contracts, as so it should be, so DON’T do it! (I have listed some Maxims of law near the bottom of th
Q. How does this affidavit create an agreement of the parties?
A. Because of Tacit Procuration and Stare Decisis. Tacit Procuration basically means ‘silent agreement’ (agreement through acquiescence) and this is the reason why ignoring documents is considered a lethal act in Admiralty. If the Respondent does not respond then he/she is simply saying, “Yes I agree/affirm by my acquiescence.” Tacit procuration enables what is commonly known as ‘self authenticating contracts.’
Q. Can the Respondent just return it?
A. Yes, but then they haven’t responded to the points raised so they are instantly at fault, so you can continue with the Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure due to non response. Damned if they do and damned if they don’t springs to mind.
Remember it is the agreement of the parties that is important. Their law is contract law, and theirs is built on fraud and deception, so create the contracts that you want, not what they want, and yours will be built on fact and truth. If they do not rebut or reply to your paperwork (they won’t) then you have a ‘lawfully binding’ agreement that no other party can lawfully or legally impair. By the way, if the respondent violates the contract then you have instant lien right, but that is for another day. My personal opinion is this; affidavits and maritime liens (which are affidavits of obligation from the private side) wipe the floor of everything in their laughable and weak fictional system.
If you don’t like the idea of creating and sending in such an elaborate affidavit as the one provided, and yet you have situations that would benefit from getting the other party into an agreement, then just a very few points can have an almighty effect. Example:
- Affiant is a private living sentient man.
- Affiant is not JOHN SMITH or any other artificial entity/legal fiction.
- The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED KINGDOM Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
- The Affiant is not liable for JOHN SMITH or any artificial derivative thereof at anytime whatsoever.
- The Affiant is not liable for any public debts/liabilities at any time whatsoever.
- The Affiant is not a member of any society whatsoever and therefore the Affiant is not bound by any society’s statutes, rules or codes.
Now if the above six (6) points are your truths (and they should be) and you put them on an affidavit to the Respondent, the Respondent has to provide evidence to the contrary of all the 6 points if they want to rebut. I think you can see for yourself that they won’t be able to do that. I think you will also notice that you don’t even have to use the above 6 points; 1 would be enough for most cases, but try and think of any situation you are involved with that couldn’t be solved by having a lawfully binding agreement/contract such as the above.
Folks; Stop messing around in fear, controversy, statutes, and other self limiting ways; many of the limiting ways I witness on this and many other forums. Create the law you want with the corporate entities. Once you realize who you are and why your true identity and power has been kept at bay, you will realize why a private sovereign affidavit is so powerful. Keep your original affidavits very safe and keep ‘certified copies’ on you at all times. An enforcement agent will only proceed so far after they have checked the validity of your paperwork