The Dutch crop circle researcher Janet Ossebaard said ...

[Trudy]

colza formation at Stonehenge ' Man-made'

My excitement was high when the second message this morning (May 10) came in: a large formation against Stonehenge!

But my disappointment was also great when I entered the formation, I stood in a field of rendering: crushed plants, board marks (print board), many foot prints and dried plants. The photos speak for themselves ...

http://www.niburu.nl/index.php?articleID=23239

The last picture, the board marks are clearly visible. When I was in my first corn formation, Uffington last year, I was also confronted with numerous broken stems. Yet I also found enough anomalies and biophysical indicators to suggest that the formation was authentic, but that energy was not well adapted to the corn plants had to go flat. In this case, however, today on May 10, 2010 compared to Stonehenge, I had come to the conclusion that I was a man-made formation. Probably a large team spent at least 20 strong. In the middle circle they had tried to weave Basket-effect. What a mess ... In itself a striking design seen from the sky well done, but on the ground ... And not even original but a continuing renovations done on the Old Sarum formation. Well, even this part of the phenomenon, and I'm glad I'm gone. The contrast between authentic and man-made is huge and always good to see. Moreover, the weather was beautiful and provided the combination of sun and clouds beautiful pictures ...

[ૐ Daisy ૐ]

Damn it.. geez that sucks..but very good job at pointing out where clearly they are cracked at the base and obviously man made.. :o(............... great imitation but i wish it was the real thing.

[Trudy]

Yeah Daisy I share your feelings ... here is another report from Janet Ossebaard about the first circle of this year ... it is in dutch so you must translate it ... but I tell you sweetheart this woman knows all about circles :)))

http://www.niburu.nl/index.php?articleID=23225

[Bishop]

thanks for this info trudy. i wish the human circle makers would stop and just let the real ones be real.

[Saiguest]

Can we really take boards and footprints as evidence that they are man-made? Anyone could go in there after they are made and put down board marks and break some stems, unless we have footage of the people creating the original crop circle the boards and broken plants mean nothing.

(This is a highly sarcastic post aimed towards those that always question, even when the answers are in front of their eyes.)

[Trudy]

This woman has made her life work to the authenticity of crop circles to establish ...
But feel free to doubt her know-how, because there are always doubters that need to be convinced.

Saiguest said:

Can we really take boards and footprints as evidence that they are man-made? Anyone could go in there after they are made and put down board marks and break some stems, unless we have footage of the people creating the original crop circle the boards and broken plants mean nothing.

(This is a highly sarcastic post aimed towards those that always question, even when the answers are in front of their eyes.)

[Saiguest]

Um..the post was sarcastic as stated in the post, but thanks Trudy.

[Saiguest]

However, gotta add this. Assuming someone DID go in after the aliens made the crop circle and damage it with boards to make it look false, she would have no way to know even with all the know-how in the world, because the planted evidence would always make it look fake. We need to be way more open minded in this world, not to mention less judgmental and more perceptive in cases such as this.

[Trudy]

I will send Janet Ossenbaard an email and ask her if she will contact other researchers to look into this crop circle . But this woman has seen up close more crop circles than you or I or anyone else ...

Saiguest said:

However, gotta add this. Assuming someone DID go in after the aliens made the crop circle and damage it with boards to make it look false, she would have no way to know even with all the know-how in the world, because the planted evidence would always make it look fake. We need to be way more open minded in this world, not to mention less judgmental and more perceptive in cases such as this.

[Saiguest]

You need to re-read my post in which it said it was sarcastic, in other words, I wasn't saying she was wrong at all, it was in fact the opposite.

[Trudy]

AHA ja ja so you were talking about ýour post ... oké I am glad that it is clear now :)))

Saiguest said:

You need to re-read my post in which it said it was sarcastic, in other words, I wasn't saying she was wrong at all, it was in fact the opposite.