H A A R P Project Bluebeam part 2

An individual’s level of consciousness is determined by the principles to which one is committed.

To maintain progress in consciousness there can be no wavering from principle, or the individual will fall back to a lower level.

Expediency is never an adequate justification.
If it’s wrong to kill another human being, that principle can allow no exceptions, regardless of how emotionally appealing a rational may be used to justify the exception.

Thus, a society that condones capital punishment will always have a problem with murder – both are products of the same level of perception.

After all, to the murderer, the killing of the victim is a justifiable exception.

Once a principle is breached, its mutated form propagates like a cancer.

A society that supports killing – whether by war, by the police, or by the penal system – can’t at the same time effectively stop “criminal” killing.

To kill is to kill is to kill; there’s no escaping that fact.
The decision to kill or not to kill is a basic issue on the path to real power; but this rudimentary step hasn’t even been addressed by 85% of the world’s population or by virtually any of its governments.

The more immediate “problem” of Right and Wrong that always diverts our societal focus only exists as a function of perception based at the lower levels of consciousness.

Little children must be taught that dangerous behaviors are “wrong,” but as they grow older, discernment should replace moralism.

Whether or not it’s wrong to kill other human beings may be a moral dilemma at lower levels of consciousness; at higher levels the very question is ridiculous.

Conventional morality is therefore a provisional substitute for the faculty of higher consciousness.

Moralism, a by-product of duality, becomes insignificant as the consciousness level rises through the 500’s, and is irrelevant
at the level of 600.
David Hawkins