THE 9/11 ABOMINATION IS GOING TO BE EXPOSED

[jose v]

THE 9/11 ABOMINATION IS GOING TO BE EXPOSED Given this explosive state of affairs, the pressure which will cause this abomination to ‘blow’ continues to accumulate, and sooner or later will result in the ‘take-down’ of all the perpetrators and those media whores, such as Rupert Murdoch and his like, who are parties to the cover-up. We know of one US broadcasting organisation which accepted a ‘funny money’ bribe of $1.68 billion to bury everything that we ourselves have published on this subject: and likewise with others.


• We also know of another media giant that accepted a corrupt payment adjacent to $2.0 billion for the same purpose: to hide the truth that we and others are reporting, from the American people.

According to the ‘ethic’ by which these Dark Forces operate, everything is permitted, with one sole exception: getting caught. The LIE exposed herewith represents GETTING CAUGHT.

We hold on file as much detailed, accumulated, authoritative, relevant technical evidence about the explosives employed to implode the Twin Towers and the associated circumstances, as any other responsible and serious investigator. But such data, while FULLY CONCLUSIVE, is nothing like as effective as human evidence that actually catches the perpetrators LYING to cover up the well-known fact that they knew all about the murderous abominations before they occurred. That evidence has now erupted onto the stage.

PUBLIC LIES HAVE AN AVERAGE LIFE OF SEVEN YEARS
Like plutonium, public lies have a half-life, and decay over a period of time. In our long experience, the average half-life of a public lie is about seven years. It is eight years since 9/11, so the time is ripe for wholesale exposure: which is why the recycling of this CIA LIE is so important.

THE RECYCLED LIE AND WHY WE EXPOSED IT
The Editor noticed the recycled lie immediately before leaving for the United States on the 11th September. By the time he had cleared airport security, he finally realised the significance of this repeated lie, and, finding an Internet location at the airport, posted this Update to our report dated 6th September. The text below has been slightly expanded:


• UPDATE, 11 SEPTEMBER 2009:
IT HAS BEEN INACCURATELY ASSERTED ON ANOTHER WEBSITE THAT THE EDITOR PAID FOR WANTA'S RELEASE FROM JAIL. THIS IS AN OLD C.I.A. LIE THAT HAS BEEN PROMULGATED FOR TWO YEARS OR MORE. The Editor did NOT procure Mr Wanta's release from jail which of course is impossible. The Editor loaned Leo/Lee Wanta $35,000 for two years on an arms'-length basis at 7% compound per annum, effective 10th June 2005 and repayable on 11th June 2007.


• He did not repay the Editor's $35,000. He has STOLEN THE EDITOR'S LOAN FUNDS.

The purpose of the loan was to settle Court 'Restitution' plus fees in respect mainly of State Tax of $14,129 plus interest that Wanta had already paid twice, in May and June 1992 (we hold copies of the relevant transaction documents). The Editor's private loan funds paid this tax bill for the THIRD time. Full details of this scandal were exposed in our final report on that subject, dated 6th August 2007 [see Archive]. But that is NOT the main point of this insert, necessitated by the repetition of this old CIA LIE, exploiting the timing of the loan. The LIE masks a colossal hornets' nest of evil.

The main point is as follows. The subtle CIA-originated LIE that the Editor paid for Wanta's release from PRISON presupposes (deceitfully) that Wanta was released in 2005 WHICH IS NOT TRUE. On the contrary, Wanta was released from jail eight or ten days after 9/11 (on 19th or 21st September 2001). But by reiterating that the Editor's funds procured Wanta's release from JAIL, the FALSE impression is given that Wanta emerged from U.S. prison FOUR YEARS after 9/11: A FABRICATION.

Wanta was collected from jail shortly after 9/11 by Gerald Salchert, resident in the United States, of Austrian extraction, and taken to the home of a relative in Wisconsin.

WHY would the C.I.A. promulgate this LIE (and we will explain later WHO started this LIE)? In order to answer that question you need to be aware of the real reason Wanta was held in jail during the run-up to 9/11. The reason is that, since Wanta had been scammed and badly treated (which maybe he deserved: but that's a separate point), the CIA had concerns that he might divulge the 9/11 plans AHEAD OF THE ABOMINATION. So they held him incarcerated until afterwards.


• What does this tell you? Work it out for yourself! Mr Wanta KNEW ABOUT 9/11 IN ADVANCE of the event, and they had to make sure that he didn't spill the beans because of his dissatisfaction at the way he had been treated. SO THEY HAVE EXPLOITED THE DATE OF THE EDITOR'S LOAN PAYMENT, WHICH OBTAINED WANTA'S EXIT FROM PROBATION (gaining him five years and two weeks, to be precise, as his scheduled probation end-date had been 28th November 2010), TO COVER UP THE FACT, EXPOSED BY THIS LIE, THAT THE C.I.A. AND THE U.S. GOVERNMENT KNEW ALL ABOUT 9/11 BEFORE IT HAPPENED. Because as Leo/Lee Wanta, who worked for the Government and the Bush Crime Syndicate, knew about 9/11 BEFORE the event, SO DID THE U.S. GOVERNMENT and the CIA. If you think this is DYNAMITE, you are 100% ACCURATE. (1)

GETTING CAUGHT OUT IS THE ONLY SIN
When elements of the Dark Forces get caught out, THEY BECOME NERVOUS AND RATTLED. We can advise you that this is what occurred after we posted the above Update. To assert that certain parties were ‘furious’ would be a mild description of their reaction. One can understand that, given the Misprision of Felony Statute [see below], there are good reasons for their anger. How DARE some nasty, British investigative reporter find them out!

http://www.worldreports.org/news/232_wanta_a_financial_terrorist_working_from_within