GEO-engineering NOT Safe-Whys, Wherefores and the EPA

[Lea Anna Cooper]

by: LA Cooper and Paul Joseph Watson

Utilizing diabolical exercises of flight, in order to control fictitious issues revolving around global warming, U.S. government scientists are bombarding the skies (“Chemtrails”) with the acid-rain causing toxin, sulfur dioxide. These are the plans to "geo-engineer" the planet, despite the consequences. Information tells us that infusing aerosols into the upper atmosphere creates a plethora of mutually known and unknown hazards, yet government officials are not hesitant to ‘jump on the bandwagon.’

The scheme to diffuse sulfur dioxide in efforts to mirror sunlight was brought up again, in a critique written in the London Guardian, titled, Geo engineering: The radical ideas to combat global warming. In this piece Ken Caldeira, a primary environmental scientist, headquartered at the Carnegie Institute in Stanford, California, encourages the idea of infusing the atmosphere with aerosols.
The article states, "One approach is to insert "scatterers" into the stratosphere." "Caldeira cites an idea to deploy jumbo jets into the upper atmosphere and deposit clouds of tiny particles there, such as sulfur dioxide. Dispersing around 1m tons of sulphur dioxides per year across 10m square kilometers of the atmosphere would be enough to reflect away sufficient amounts of sunlight."
Scientists, who are currently supported by the U.S. government, are now conducting testing similar to Caldeira’s plan.

The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory, in Aiken, S.C, performed studies, which involve discharging massive quantities of particle matter. In this case "porous-walled glass micro-spheres," into the stratosphere.
This past April, Nobel Prize winner, Paul Crutzen, planned a project, which reached its conclusion and is intimately tied to "proposed sending aircraft 747s to dump huge quantities of sulfur particles into the far-reaches of the stratosphere to cool down the atmosphere."

What is known about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulfur dioxide is bad enough, since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA "Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our nation's cultural heritage."

The health effects of bombarding the skies with sulfur dioxide alone are enough to raise serious questions about whether such programs should even be allowed to proceed.
The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulfur.
- Neurological effects and behavioral changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism

According to the LennTech website, "Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause fetal damage and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother's milk. Finally, sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals."

Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns that the consequences of tinkering with the planet's delicate eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.

"If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid," said Singer.

Even Greenpeace's chief UK scientist - a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation - Doug Parr has slammed attempts to Geo-engineer the planet as "outlandish" and "dangerous".

Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who recently proposed a bizarre plan to send spaceships into the upper atmosphere that would be used to block out the Sun, admits that Geo-engineering could cause "conflicts between nations if Geo-engineering projects go wrong."

Given all the immediate dangers associated with bombarding the atmosphere with sulfur dioxide, along with the unknown dangers of other Geo-engineering projects, many people are concerned that "chemtrails" could be a secret component of the same agenda to alter the Earth's eco-system. This graphic proposes, "Spraying aluminum powder and barium oxide into high levels of the atmosphere, again delivered by aircraft, to increase planetary reflectance (albedo) and cloud cover." High levels of barium have been found in substances associated with chemtrails.

Reports of chemtrails, jet plumes emitted from planes that hang in the air for hours and do not dissipate, often blanketing the sky in criss-cross patterns, have increased dramatically over the last 10 years. Many have speculated that they are part of a government program to alter climate, inoculate humans against certain pathogens, or even to toxify humans as part of a population reduction agenda.

In conducting Google searches, one finds discussion, such as this example, of using sulfur dioxide as a jet fuel additive to be dispersed over the world during routine commercial flights. Aviation Fuel Additive to Deliver Stratospheric Aerosols (Is this NOT why they stopped making aerosols?...because of the Ozone?)

"I suggest that both the sulfur dioxide and the silica particles could be delivered into the stratosphere by dissolving an additive in jet aviation fuel," writes engineer John Gorman, who has conducted experiments to test the feasibility of such a scenario.
"We would want to burn fuel containing the additive specifically when the aircraft was cruising in the lower stratosphere," he adds.

Earlier this year, KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail, contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.

The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a "hallmark of chemtrails." KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or "more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA." The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality confirmed that the high levels of Barium were "very unusual," but commented that "proving the source was a whole other matter" in its discussion with KSLA.

KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that "short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure problems." The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails.

Indeed, barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant from suspected Geo-engineering experimentation.
KSLA also put aerosolized-chemical testing in its historical context, citing a voluminous number of unclassified tests exposed in 1977 Senate hearings. The tests included experimenting with biochemical compounds on the public. KSLA reports that "239 populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969."

One of the accepted truisms of scientific study is the fact that if scientists are proposing an idea, then those scientists with access to the bottomless pit of black-budget secret government funding are already doing it. It is highly likely that chemtrails are merely one manifestation of "Geo-engineering" that is taking place without proper debate, notification or any form of legality, and with a callous disregard for the potential dangers to both our health and our environment.

Currently, the issue of ‘fish, geese, duck and tree deaths’ are occurring in places like Michigan. Since the heavier concentration of chemicals has been strewn into the atmosphere, intense rain has fallen in this area, following the deliberate cloud creation, say witnesses. On what should have been a 72 degree day, with a low of 58, turned into a 34 degree night accompanied by extremely heavy cloud cover.

One woman who was questioned reported that the pairs of geese and ducks have split apart, with several females struggling to walk into a nearby field, laid down and died. The same occurrence took place with the female ducks. The small, private inland lake, which supported life for these birds, is reported to now contain dying algae, which was once very fruitful for the water’s inhabitants. The hearty catfish, which were very healthy last year, are dying and floating to the surface of the water, looking pasty ‘white.’ These residents also said that the usually vibrant trees, which are imperative for the oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange, are struggling to survive. The leaves that are attempting to come out have also turned ‘white’ and several other trees are becoming barren of any life. (No leaves, NO trees, NO Oxygen). A third witness reported that during a rainfall she was required to walk to another building on the site where she is employed. As the rain fell on her brand new eyeglasses, they became pitted, and there was a rainbow created within the lenses. She also stated that in paying nearly $400 for tri-focals and transition lenses, that they will ‘not block out sunlight at all’ when spraying occurs. The aluminum particles contained in the spray are reflecting so brightly, she is blinded while traveling west, which she must do to get to her employment. Another gentleman who was required to travel with her at the same time, spoke as a witness to this occurrence. She also stated that since her face was getting wet by the rain, it dripped into her eyes. Her vision has since deteriorated. Within those Michigan reports are the fact that other creatures are dying as well. A rotting corpse of a deer was spotted in a field, with no clue as to why it died there. It had not been shot, and from the investigation did not have any obvious diseases of the lungs, and the stomach was clear. Ecology important creatures such as bees, fruit bats, and even worms are almost non-existent.

The idea of Geo-engineering our delicate atmosphere with toxic chemicals by using thousands of additional aircraft in the sky's will NOT fix any global warming issues we now have. As these toxic chemicals fall to the earth in the form of yet one more acid rain, it becomes perfectly clear that this type of environmental manipulation is presenting dangerous consequences. The consensus of those who watch the skies, California Sky Watch.com, is that if this continues, a huge price to humankind will be paid. The destruction of our delicate balance in the eco-system will suffer for many decades to come, and what will be left for the children of the future?

If this is governments’ easy answer, then they’d better go back to the drawing board and rethink their position. These deadly chemicals are falling into our global waters, on and into our earth and bodies. When these toxic rains are absorbed into the ground, then what will become of future farming generations? Has Monsanto corporation figured out how to manipulate the plant DNA so well, that they can grow anything in toxic soil? Will all the masterminds behind the wheel of control know how to regain the life of the trees for the earth’s oxygen supply?

Recall, in 2003 our total oxygen quantity in the air was down to 14%. Think of that! That was 6 years ago. Can you begin to imagine what the new 'low' is now? Is government going to foot the bill for the billions of gallons of fuel being burned in the aircraft, which is causing more problems to air quality? Did scientists that invented these toxic concoctions want to consider what this is doing to plants and trees; to fish and birds; to the mammals who are beaching themselves and dying? Don’t ask WHY? Everyone involved truly needs to reconsider all of these things. Our precious oil supplies being burned away in aircraft dispersing toxic chemicals, and more jet fuel burnoff is NOT the right answer. Never ask the naive question of ‘why’ the EPA is finding toxicity in the ground water. Isn’t that a rather silly question? Well...just ask YES WE CAN about it. Conducting these irrational tests because WE CAN does NOT make it right. Sorry folks!