Saviors Of Earth

The Unification Epicenter of True Lightworkers


Interesting. :) We've just read in "The History of Banking" that the world's controllers apparently have believed the earth cannot sustain a population at the levels already reached - but that those controllers are "of two minds" about how the problem should be approached - swiftly? or more slowly?

Earlier this month we'd received word of a meeting of Very Important People in New York and there was speculation about the purpose of that meeting.

Now comes this article from the UK's Sunday Times, found here:


From The Sunday Times
May 24, 2009

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation

America's richest people meet to discuss ways of tackling a 'disastrous' environmental, social and industrial threat

John Harlow, Los Angeles

SOME of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population and speed up improvements in health and education.

The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.

Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America’s wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.


... The billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favourite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might settle on an “umbrella cause” that could harness their interests.

The issues debated included reforming the supervision of overseas aid spending to setting up rural schools and water systems in developing countries. Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority.

This could result in a challenge to some Third World politicians who believe contraception and female education weaken traditional values.

Gates, 53, who is giving away most of his fortune, argued that healthier families, freed from malaria and extreme poverty, would change their habits and have fewer children within half a generation.


... there was “nothing as crude as a vote” but a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.

“This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest. “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

Why all the secrecy? “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government,” he said.

Views: 163


You need to be a member of Saviors Of Earth to add comments!

Join Saviors Of Earth

Comment by Mason on May 26, 2009 at 4:40pm
I don't think anything there really mentions KILLING PEOPLE AS A SOLUTION (Which we all know isn't a solution at all.). It more so has the rich intelligent community talking about reasonable answers to population growth. Bill Gates my lead Example is offering ways so 3rd world countries can fend off life threating aliments and hardships, solving these would lead to more stable life styles and then less kids, I bet a billion$ that your parents had 6 or more siblings because thats how it had to be back then now us as parents only having 1-2 children on average.

Pleiadian Agenda, I think your comment was completely out of tune, you seem very ignorant and coming from a dark place

SoE Visitors



© 2021   Created by Besimi.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service