Climate Gate, Copenhagen and the NWO.

[Bishop]

Im feeling too concerned to not write a post about this.

Everything i could think of to write is all said very well in the video series 'we the people of the world' recently posted here by jim4hope and on youtube. thanks Jim.


If you haven't watched this yet, you really should.

This is the major grab for power by the nwo, i had thought we were passed this power of Illuminati but its too obvious that we are not, this is real, and its scary.
Im not sure what we can do about it right not, but i tell you, if i were their in Copenhagen, i sure would be among the protesters there.
The governments there are all ignoring the climate gate emails. Proving the sun is cause of climate change and Co2 isnt a horrible obnoxious gas. Their fear campaign disgusts me.
I love to believe that nothing bad would be allowed to happen, but i feel this slipping away. i feel we could lose everything here, we really need now, to regain our individual power. let us fight the nwo.
please, your thoughts on this.

Namaste

[JIM4HOPE]

THIS A NEW POSTING FROM A COMMENT FROM US NEWS A GOOD SIGN FOR THE LIGHT WERE PICKING UP THE MOMENTUM WE NEED TO GET THESE CONTROL FREAKS THE HELL OUT OF OUR LIVES..A poster asked me to define "someone". Okay.

How about 66% of the American People?

December 15, 2009

An Associated Press-Stanford University poll (PDF) released today shows that just 31% of Americans believe that experts agree on the science behind global warming.

Question 22 in the poll asked “Do you think most scientists agree with one another about whether or not global warming is happening, or do you think there is a lot of disagreement among scientists on this issue?”

66% of respondents said that in their opinion “most scientists disagree”.

It looks like the American public is waking up at it smells a rat. Really, how long do you think Joe Average was going be name-called and talked down to by a group of activists who do nothing but insult their intelligence? The worm is turning and it's a big worm. People are tired of being told that only an "advocate/scientist/politician" knows what is good for them. It's going to get ugly because Joe knows he's been played ... and I think Joe is angry.

[JIM4HOPE]

Russians yell foul on Climategate
By: Barbara Hollingsworth

12/17/09
Another blow for global warming alarmists shivering at the Copenhagen climate conference: The Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) claims that Britain’s (formerly) prestigious Hadley Center for Climate Change tampered with Russian climate data.

IEA claims that only 25 percent of Russia’s weather stations – and only the ones near highly populated areas that appeared to substantiate the center’s theory of man-made global warming - were included in Hadley’s results. Significantly, IEA charges that the center ignored temperature reports from over 40 percent of Russian territory, including Siberia, which have not shown any substantial warming over the past few decades.

Because Russia makes up 12.5 percent of the Earth’s entire land mass, IEA says that because of this error, all of the U.N.’s global temperature findings must now be recalculated. Preferably before any international agreement is made based on bogus claims.

Footnote: A March 2004 email from then-Climate Research Unit director Phil Jones to Penn State’s Michael Mann released by an unknown hacker at East Anglia University shows that Jones knew about the problem with the Russian data five years ago and tried to suppress it:

“Recently rejected two papers (one for JGR and for GRL) from people saying CRU has it wrong over Siberia. Went to town in both reviews, hopefully successfully. If either appears I will be very surprised, but you never know with GRL.”

[JIM4HOPE]

Every body needs to understand if you use reports off any MSM sources it is being published and sent to you the reader for promoting there agenda for global government .actualy it is not even a government it is the ruling master who for your own well being and to the health of the planet This ruling body known as the NEW WORLD ORDER WILL KNOW MAKE ALL THE FUTURE DECISIONS TO RESIST WILL BE CERTAIN DEATH FOR ALL OF US .THE NEW WORLD ORDER WILL TAKE CARE OF YOUR PROPERTY FROM KNOW ON FOR NATIONAL RULERS SECURITY THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION IF YOU DO NOT COOPERATE YOU WILL BE FORCED TO COMPLY AS NEEDED BY FORCE FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR RULERS SAFETY ...Do you ever wander as it is right know I still believe they wuold follow there new ruling body as a duty for there own safetys sake they must make itb clear to there new ruler please protect me from all the mistakes I make is this what it is going to be like???

Jack Hunter
Campaign For Liberty
Tuesday, Dec 22nd, 2009

When our government was insisting that we go to war with Iraq, I told anyone who would listen that it didn’t make any sense, that Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to the U.S., and that our leaders were simply up to no good. My conservative friends angrily disagreed, almost in unison, declaring that the evidence supplied by the Bush White House concerning WMDs was comprehensive and concrete, and that the terror “crisis” was far too dire to entertain any dissent from some blind ignoramus like me.

”

Global warming — or to use the latest fashionable phrase, “climate change” — has quickly become an article of faith for the Left. Heralding the importance of last week’s Copenhagen Climate Summit, the left-leaning British daily The Guardian published the following: “Today 56 newspapers in 45 countries take the unprecedented step of speaking with one voice through a common editorial. We do so because humanity faces a profound emergency.”

This is not the first time the media has aided the scientific community in an effort to warn the world about atmospheric Armageddon. As Gary Sutton of Forbes.com notes, in 1975 the U.S. government openly pushed the “coming ice age,” while Random House published The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age.” Sutton adds that “Newsweek fell in line and did a cover issue warning us of global cooling in April 28, 1975. And The New York Times, Aug. 14, 1976, reported ‘many signs that Earth may be headed for another ice age.”

Fifty-six newspapers in 45 countries can’t be wrong, can they? No more than Newsweek and The New York Times were wrong in the 1970s, not to mention the National Science Board who also sounded the “ice age” alarm in 1974.



When the now-famous “Climategate” story erupted recently, in which it was discovered through hacked e-mail accounts that prominent scientists might have fudged data to support global warming claims or sought to suppress climate change skeptics within their own ranks, the mainstream media was not quick to pick up the story.

As one e-mail from Climategate scientist Kevin Trenberth, concerning the failure of computer models, read, “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment, and it is a travesty that we can’t.” Replied fellow scientist Michael Mann, “As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all; it’s about plausible deniability.” Climategate seems to suggest that some global warming scientists were more interested in constructing a narrative to support their claims than properly informing the public based on sound data.

The same week Climategate broke, Voice of America News reported that “the Bush administration was looking for a link between the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington and Saddam Hussein, hours after the attacks took place,” according to former British ambassador to the United States Christopher Meyer. “We found ourselves scrabbling for the smoking gun, which was another way of saying, ‘It’s not that Saddam has to prove himself innocent, we now bloody well have to prove he’s guilty,’” Meyer said.

Would the “experts” in the lead up to the war in Iraq intentionally mislead the public or fabricate evidence to advance an agenda? Would the scientific establishment or mainstream media suppress pertinent information about climate change that contradicts their agenda?

The alleged authority of “expert” opinion does not hold much sway with me. I do not pretend to know more than government officials, journalists, scientists, economists, and various other sophists and calculators, but I do know that for all their collective wisdom, they are just as often wrong as they are right. Does anyone really believe that stimulus and TARP spending has helped the economy, as the “experts” contend? Does anyone really believe the Iraq war had a damn thing to do with terrorism, as government officials still claim?

It is this experience-driven skepticism that prevents me from becoming too worried about so-called global warming. The same liberals who shriek at my doubt and believe that science is beyond politics when it comes to their sacred issue of climate change conveniently forget that scientific consensus once told us that racial minorities were intellectually incapable of competing with their white counterparts or that homosexuality was a mental disorder. Oh, but that was just politics masquerading as science, the Left might say. Global warming is different.

And it may be different. Only time will tell. But one need not be an expert of any sort to recognize that for both Left and Right, faith dictates the facts and today’s truths often become tomorrow’s fiction. And it is mighty curious that for every new crisis, a massive and expansive government corrective is always the proposed solution.












’