The Unification Epicenter of True Lightworkers
POSTER ON A CLASSROOM WALL
Do our children need this?
A recent pamphlet published by the German government contains these chilling words:
“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.”
(See here. The link to this explosive article has been deliberately suppressed by the German government within the last year or so. The last time I checked, it was there; now it’s gone.)
So we have now come to this critical point: where mutual masturbation between parent and child is being promoted by degenerate government officials as a life-enhancing recreational activity. Good for “bonding”. Next step: state-organized incest.
Toddlers are encouraged in this toxic official document, once available on the internet but now discreetly removed, to indulge in “unlimited masturbation.” Their parents are expected to offer practical demonstrations if need be — the better to produce sexual precocity in their offspring. “Children should learn there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body,” the booklet advises. “The body is a home you should be proud of.”
Children, it is suggested in the brocure, should be taught the movements of copulation as soon as they reach the age of four, giving them what virtually amounts to a crash course in the Kama Sutra as soon as they have learned to walk.
Depravity, it seems, cannot be taught too early.
In Holland, things have gone further. Here a political party, set up by convicted pedophiles, clamors for the legalization of child pornography and intergenerational sex between children of twelve and adults old enough to be their grandparents. I forgot to mention bestiality. They want to legalize that too.
When husband and wife find themselves separated for some reason—for example, if one of them is in hospital or away on business—there is always the family pet to turn to as a sexual surrogate. There is nothing new about this repulsive suggestion. In 2001, Jewish professor Peter Singer of Princeton University put in a good word for bestiality, suggesting in an essay called Heavy Petting that one might like to get it on with the family dog if one were feeling a bite lonesome. No one batted an eyelid at Princeton or elsewhere. Jewish professors at elite universities, after all, are beyond reproach. Ticking them off for being filthy-minded perverts would not only be tiresomely uncool, it would also be “anti-Semitic”. And we can’t have that, can we?
We live in a world in which we have to pretend that mutual masturbation between parent and child, and sex with the family dog, is just one of those things we need to take in our stride—lest we be accused of sexual prudery.
The question is this: who is to blame for the sexual perversions we see proliferating all round us? How did it get so bad? What would our great grandparents have thought if they could suddenly wake up and find themselves in our world? Wouldn’t they be shocked out of their senses?
This sexual licentiousness, growing by the day thanks to the internet and mass media, is far deadlier and more corrosive than it was half a century ago, before the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Those who are responsible for this sickening descent into sexual depravity are clearly the same type of people who helped to kickstart the sexual revolution. They are the same people, moreover, who control the mass media.
Who controls the mass media? Any idea? Who determines the imagery and attitudes drip-feeding steadily into the minds of the public? Who runs Hollywood? Who contaminates mass consciousness? Who defiles the collective mind? Who pulls the puppet strings of marionette man? Who are the Bad Shepherds leading the sheeple astray?
Who are to blame, in short, for letting the world go to hell in a handcart?
I won’t bother to answer these questions. More to the point, I dare not. If you don’t know who owns the media—lock, stock and barrel—you’re wasting your time reading this article.
— § —
To undermine Western civilization, the Frankfurt School Jews—from 1923 onwards into the 1960s and beyond—called for the most negative and destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life. Kevin MacDonald wrote at great length about these unpleasant people in his magnum opus The Culture of Critique. To destabilize society and bring it to its knees, to engineer collapse, to produce crisis and catastrophe: this became the aim of these maladjusted and mentally sick Jewish revolutionaries masquerading as enlightened intellectuals.
They were simply sick-minded charlatans with university degrees.
All of them had one thing in common which they did their best to conceal from the public: they were all compulsive masturbators. Their brains were kinked up, their characters completely warped, with all the jerking off they kept doing in their spare time — that is, when they were not busy penning poisonous treatises trying to infect other people with their sexual perversions.
Jewish psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957) was a case in point. He is sometimes described as the high priest of the “masturbation industry”, to borrow a phrase from E. Michael Jones’s magisterial work Libido Dominandi, where Reich is discussed in great detail. Sex, according to the philosophers of the Sexual Revolution inspired by Reich, is to be the panacea for all society’s problems: the new opium of the people. If people cannot have bread, let them eat cake. If they cannot have jobs, security, fulfillment, and a valid purpose in life, let them have sex as a substitute. If nothing else, recreational sex will provide a useful distraction and give people something to do.
A compulsive masturbator himself, Reich believed that masturbation was a useful tool in producing “well-balanced” individuals without religious hang-ups or anti-Semitic attitudes. His major finding (here and here) was that masturbation and the religious life were incompatible, which is why he advocated masturbation as the most effective means of eradicating the religious instinct—which he regarded as the ultimate evil. “What Reich discovered was a fundamental truth of sexual politics, one discovered by the Catholic Church long ago,” Dr E. Michael Jones comments. “Either masturbation destroys your prayer life, or prayer destroys your ability to enjoy masturbation. The two forms of activity are psychically mutually exclusive.” (See here, p. 259)
The result is that Reich, as you might expect, was not only an enthusiastic devotee of the solitary vice but recommended it to all his patients, even going so far as to masturbate his female patients in person. “The pleasure of living and the pleasure of orgasm are identical,” he pontificated, thereby equating infinite happiness with the provision of an infinite number of orgasms.
Reich was, by his own account, not only a compulsive masturbator from early childhood but a self-confessed pervert with wide-ranging sexual interests.
Beginning sexual activity at the early age of four with a maidservant whose pubic hair he was allowed to play with, he went on to seduce the family cook at eleven-and-a-half. While still a small boy, he had begun to take an unhealthy interest in farm animals and could be seen prowling around the stables where he “stimulated mares by inserting whip handles in their vaginas.” At 15 he began visiting brothels where his insatiable appetites made him the talk of the town. If you doubt me, read his Autobiography. You’ll find it all there, set out in grisly detail.
Renowned sexual researcher Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956), though not Jewish himself, was financed by the Rockefellers and made a household name by the Jewish New York Times. He too, like Reich, was an out-and-out charlatan, a lapsed Catholic turned atheist who was fanatically devoted to masturbation and to all manner of sexual perversions. These he did his best to popularize by attempting to normalize them, making out that they were far more common than most people supposed.
It comes as no surprise to learn that Kinsey, like Reich before him, was an avid consumer of pornography, even going so far as to photograph his own penis on several occasions and getting his wife to act in home-made porn movies. A sexual pervert of the kinkiest kind, Kinsey once inserted a toothbrush into his urethra and had himself filmed, subsequently adding this gem to his porn collection. Himself a homosexual with an avid interest in little boys, he would make a point of measuring the penis, both recumbent and erect, of every male he interviewed while conducting his “research”. Why? One can only guess.
Legalizing pedophilia is the ultimate aim of the Homosexual Lobby, an aim which would have won Kinsey’s enthusiastic support. The Father of the Sexual Revolution was not only a bisexual pedophile, with a preference for little boys, he was also a sado-masochistic criminal who was actively involved in the sex torture of little children. (For more details, see here)
If you wish for an in-depth analysis of Kinsey’s kinky preoccupations, this YouTube video may be of some help.
A year before he died, Kinsey sliced off the foreskin of his penis with a pocket knife—a crude attempt at self-circumcision. No one has been able to figure out why he did this. Kinsey’s death, however, has been ascribed to his sexual proclivities.
Dr. Judith Reisman writes:
An early adherent and advocate of masturbation, Kinsey suffered an untimely death due, at least in part, to ‘orchitis,’ a lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of orgiastic self-abuse.
Kinsey believed that all sex was legitimate—pedophilia, bestiality, incest, adultery, prostitution, group sex, voyeurism, indecent exposure, female exhibitionism, mutual masturbation, sadomasochism, sodomy, coprophilia—and he worked to overthrow all laws prohibiting any of these perversions. (See here)