Saviors Of Earth

The Unification Epicenter of True Lightworkers

Trump's support of mass surveillance reveals his real loyalties.

Why Isn't NSA Surveillance an Election Issue?

November 2, 2016

CwWJKaAVIAASpGP.jpgTrump's support of mass surveillance reveals his real loyalties. 



Mass surveillance isn't designed to protect the population from terrorists. 
It's designed to protect the one per cent from the population
This is the same one per cent Hillary represents. 

How hard would it be for Trump to pledge to end surveillance of 
hundreds of millions of patriotic Americans?
 
by Henry Makow Ph.D. 
 
The plantation is stirring in anticipation of Donald Trump's election victory next week. Trump has many policies popular with an electorate feeling increasingly disenfranchised.  The exception is Trump's support for police-state mass-surveillance, and support for the bogus war on terror, the Patriot Act and Muslims Did 9-11 hoax. 
 
Since both he and Hillary Clinton are on the same page, mass surveillance has not been an issue in the current election. This is surprising since Edward Snowden caused a sensation when he first drew attention to this in 2013. 
 
Trump portrays himself as the dragon slayer who is going to "drain the swamp" and "make America great again."  
 
What would be more popular than a pledge to restore civil rights? What could be more fundamental to a "free" country than the right to privacy? 
 
images (84).jpeg
Yes, NSA powers were supposedly curtailed by the Freedom Act in June 2015, but not even Donald Trump believes communications are private. In a December 2015 interview, he says, "I assume when I pick up my telephone, people are listening to my conversations anyway, if you want to know the truth. It's pretty sad commentary, but I err on the side of security." (The NSA hasn't stopped spying on anybody.)
 
How hard would it be for Trump to pledge to end the surveillance of hundreds of millions of loyal patriotic Americans? He has already pledged to treat Muslim immigrants differently. Why couldn't he pledge to restrict surveillance to suspicious characters? 
 
Instead he fear mongers to justify "erring on the side of security":  "When you have people that are beheading you if you're a Christian... when you have the world looking at us and would like to destroy us as quickly as possible, I err on the side of security, and so that's the way it is, that's the way I've been, and some people like that, frankly, and some people don't like that."
 
TRUE LOYALTIES
 
Trump's position reveals his real loyalties. Mass surveillance isn't designed to protect the population from terrorists. It's designed to protect the one per cent from the population. This is the same one per cent Hillary represents. 
 
My view is that the Illuminati control both the Left and the Right. There are many routes to the same destination. One may be slower than the other, but I have not seen a radical change of course from any new government in the West. Ronald Reagan was supposedly a Conservative.
 
One candidate may appear to be globalist, and the other anti globalist, but one theme seems to remain constant, undying support for Israel 
and all that represents, confrontation with Iran, and mass surveillance.  The Electorate is not given a choice where it really matters. 
 
Trump is Illuminati. I think his loyalties are to the Illuminati. In spite of this, I would still vote for him in the hope that I am wrong, and he will keep his promises. 
 -----
 
NOTE:  The election campaign has confirmed the political reality presented by this and other "conspiracy" sites for decades: the Masonic Jewish central bankers (the Illuminati) run the Western world through cutouts like both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, control of corporations and the mass media. These cutouts are controlled by blackmail due to their corruption, satanism and pedophilia. The bankers are Cabalists (occultists,Satanists)-- meaning they redefine reality according to their own interests and perversions. Increasingly people are noticing that the world is being turned upside down. Common decency, common sense and respect for objective truth are in short supply.
 
 
First Comment from Glen-
 
  "One candidate may appear to be globalist, and the other anti globalist, but one theme seems to remain constant, undying support for Israel 
and all that represents, confrontation with Iran, and mass surveillance.  The Electorate is not given a choice where it really matters."
 
 As they say in the porn industry, the above quote is "the money shot". After all the hoop-la and bluster no matter who sits in "the House" when all votes are tallied (stolen or not) this country's sick and perverted love for the State of Israel will forge on at full speed. Our foreign policy will once again originate in Jerusalem and not in D.C. Our new sitting president will Kneel before their almighty Israeli Zionist rulers and perform whatever service is demanded of them. Israel will continue to receive more foreign aid from the good old U.S. than all the other countries in world combined. AIPAC will continue to rule over every other lower form of elected vermin in the District of Corruption. 
 
  The American police state will continue to grow. The Patriot Act and NDAA will remain unhindered. We will NEVER, EVER see the level of freedom we enjoyed pre-9/11. Please don't fool yourselves and think anything related to an out of control and severely wounded empire will change. Tyranny will march on as you are continually bled dry due every growing taxes and medical cost.
 
    All issues that would lead to a better and less intrusive life for John Q. Citizen will never be touched. If you believe differently, then you my friend are fooling yourself. Please read this Quote from Carroll Quigley one more time. It is the reason nothing will change until the whole corrupt system is brought down.
 
   "The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies... is a foolish idea. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigour, approximately the same basic policies." 
ShareThis   Google + 

- See more at: http://henrymakow.com/2016/11/why-isnt-nsa-surveillance.html#sthash...

http://henrymakow.com/2016/11/why-isnt-nsa-surveillance.html

Views: 68

Reply to This

SoE Visitors

 

  

© 2018   Created by Besimi.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service