Date: Thursday, August 21, 2014
A recent Affidavit[1] released and signed by Judge Navin-Chandra Naidu (aka Dr. Aidun of the Neil Keenan Team) on Tuesday July 22, 2014 attesting to the validity of one alleged Dr. Edmund K. Silva, Jr., the alleged Sovereign Monarch of the Kingdom of Hawai’i has raised several alarm bells among many alternative researchers including myself.
The document which states in capital letters at the top ‘UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I ATTEST AS FOLLOWS’ contains several inconsistencies and unverifiable and erroneous statements. For example the opening paragraph attests to the academic qualifications of Silva, purportedly a “Ph.D. Doctorate in Political Science” awarded by “His Majesty’s University of The Royal Borneo Nations, Hong Kong”[2]. Firstly, it would be much easier and more transparent to produce a copy of the relevant documentation from this ‘university’ than to produce an affidavit relating to this material. Secondly, and even more concerning, is that a comprehensive search of the Internet revealed not one reference to this supposed ‘university’ and a comprehensive research at libraries worldwide has not been able to turn up even one mention of this ‘university’.
Another alarming detail that has emerged from investigative research is that this signed affidavit by ‘Judge Navin-Chandra Naidu’ aka Dr. Aidun of the Keenan Team has at the bottom of the document the following accreditations:
Judge Navin-Chandra Naidu
Judge Member # 01798766, American Bar Association
Member #1040751, International Bar Association
Member, National American Indian Court Judges Association
This is troublesome, as a copyrighted document[3] by the American Bar Associationand The Bureau of National Affairs dated September 25, 2013 and published by the Bloomberg BNA contains the following paragraphs
“A related example is the case of Navin C. Naidu, a nonlawyer, promised a ‘client’ that in exchange for $5,000 he would order the client’s foreclosure case removed from the Colorado Court of Appeals to the Eccleslastical Court of Justice, a Colorado non-profit corporation that employs Mr Naidu as a “judge”. The client paid and Mr Naidu filed a notice of removal to the eccleslastical court in the foreclosure case.
Of course, the court of appeals struck Mr. Naidu’s notice of removal. Mr. Naidu stopped returning the client’s calls. The client was never able to get a refund of his fee. The Colorado Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel has filed a petition for injunction against Mr. Naidu and ecclesiastical court, and the case is pending (People v. Naidu, No. 12SA271 Colo. Filed Sept 18, 2012).”
A second document[4] which our research has uncovered from the Colorado Supreme Court cites the “following individuals and businesses have been publicly enjoined from engaging in any further acts of unauthorized practice of law, by order of the Colorado Supreme Court, since January 1, 2000. None of these individuals or businesses is currently licensed to practice law in Colorado. These individuals and businesses cannot legally represent you in a court proceeding, in a divorce, in immigration services, or in any other instance where the services of a licensed attorney would be required:”
Name |
Supreme Court |
Supreme |
NAIDU, NAVIN C. |
12SA271 |
09/17/13 |
|||
ECCLESIASTICAL COURT OF JUSTICE |
12SA271 |
09/17/13 |
|||
An Affidavit is a very serious document and if Naidu’s statements in this document are, as they appear to be, a lie, then it is a very serious issue.
The consequences of lying in an Affidavit are as follows:
An individual who lies about the content within an affidavit may be sued for perjury and can also be subject to the sentence given to others who lie under oath if he or she is convicted of perjury. Any person who is eligible or allowed to take an oath in a court is typically entitled to make an affidavit as well. Doing so means that the affiant is aware of the affidavit contents, the importance of the oath and the consequences for it[5].
Given that Naidu has signed his name as a Judge then this makes lying on an affidavit even more reprehensible and seriously calls into question the reputation and validity of the people he has being lying about, i.e. Silva and himself (and all those associated with him).
I have been contacted, personally, by distraught individuals who were caught up in the ‘scam’ mentioned above in the Bloomberg article and I am appalled that these innocent people have not only been duped in such a way, but have also been subjected to intimidation and threats (I, too, have experienced intimidation and threats from Naidu and others for addressing this issue).
This issue needs to be addressed by the Keenan Team and if they have hard factual evidence to dispute the above facts such as the alleged report from the Attorney General’s office validating and clearing Naidu, which a member of the Keenan Team says took place, I think now would be an appropriate time to produce this document. Producing this document would ensure the Keenan Team has acted professionally in their dealings with Naidu and Silva and would demonstrate to all that they have acted in good faith and that they were covered in their dealings by documentation obtained from the Attorney General’s office.
NOTE: As documents which I and other alternative researchers cite in relation to this matter may develop the strange habit of disappearing after they are mentioned, please note that I have both electronic and hard copies filed away of all documentation cited here which can be produced for further appraisal if necessary.
[1] http://www.scripturalaw.org/KOH-ED-AFFDVIT_072214.pdf
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_higher_education_institutions_in_Hong_Kong
[4] https://www.coloradosupremecourt.com/Regulation/UPL_Injuction_Listing.htm
